We build tools for developers and small businesses. Every claim we make comes labeled with its evidence: what we measured, what we tested, and what we haven't proven yet.
Three AI coding agents test each other's work. Waitlist open.
vincentin developmentDocument automation for small businesses.
einsteins_labplannedA coding and STEM playground for young learners.
One AI can be confidently wrong. Triple Agentic gives your task to Claude, Gemini, and GPT at once, runs every agent's tests against every other agent's code, and hands you the result with the evidence attached. You make the final call.
Each agent gets its own isolated copy of your repository. None can touch the others' work or your code.
Each agent writes a solution and a test suite that says what "correct" means to it.
Every suite runs against every solution, each on a clean copy. A solution has to pass the others' tests, not just its own.
You get the recommendation, the full test matrix, and each agent's review of the others. Nothing reaches your code without your approval.
| Test (written by) | A's code | B's code | C's code |
|---|---|---|---|
| a::sixth_attempt_gets_429 | pass | pass | pass |
| a::counter_resets_after_a_minute | pass | fail | pass |
| b::429_has_retry_after | pass | pass | fail |
| c::blocked_ip_unblocks | pass | fail | pass |
Every agent's own tests passed. Cross-testing caught a counter that never resets and a missing Retry-After header. Sample data showing the format, not a recorded run; agents are anonymized so no model is singled out.
We don't have benchmark results yet. So we're not claiming Triple Agentic catches more errors or saves more time than a single AI. The benchmark compares three agents against one model and against best-of-N from a single model, on problems with known answers. We'll publish every result, failures included.
Nothing below has a release date. Each ships when it passes its own checks, and we'll say which checks those were.
Turn the paperwork a small business repeats every week into templates that fill themselves, with a person reviewing anything that matters before it goes out.
Real projects instead of toy exercises, starting with an astronomy tutorial that maps the stars from Earth using NASA data. It will have a free tier.
A number without a source doesn't go on this site. If we haven't measured it, we say so.
AI can propose, test, and argue. Nothing ships to your code or your customers without a human's approval.
When all three models agreed on an edge case and all three were wrong, that went in the record too.
Every decision gets a designated skeptic who makes the strongest case against it before anyone votes.
Turn on "Show sources" near the top of the page to see where each number came from.
Taken from a real run or from our continuous integration, with the date.
Enforced by a named test in our suite. Not yet checked in the real world.
A decision or event in the public record. Evidence that it happened, not that it works.
Something we intend to do. No dates are promised.